Hi all guys,
the discussion in following up on INFRA-3601[1], please join to
correct me if I'm wrong!
Many thanks in advance,
Simo

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3601

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/



On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> just for the record (for the new contributors). As long as your incubating 
> the following rules apply:
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html
>
> At the time you graduate you need to check who really was active and 
> 'cleanup' the PPMC. So not every person which was on the PPMC automatically 
> makes it to the final PMC anyway ...
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> --- On Mon, 5/2/11, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> From: Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: OGNL Infrastructure questions
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Date: Monday, May 2, 2011, 7:11 AM
>> +1
>>
>>
>>
>> 2011/5/2 Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com>:
>> >> My issue (for the commons PMC I guess) is how
>> committer votes will
>> >> happen when OGNL graduates.
>> >>
>> >> After graduation, how would one of the current
>> contributors propose a
>> >> new committer if they are not themselves on the
>> Commons PMC?
>> >
>> > Proposal:
>> >
>> > - If you are a Commons PMC Member, you are an OGNL
>> PPMC member by default
>> > - If a Committer is invited to the PPMC, an additional
>> vote on Commons
>> > PMC is necessary, b/c he will join the Commons PMC
>> after graduation by
>> > default
>> > - A contributor can be proposed by anybody - its up to
>> the PPMC to open the vote
>> > - A new Committer can be elected by the PPMC with
>> binding votes; as
>> > usual other Committers can vote unbinding. I don't
>> think it creates
>> > any problems b/c usually there is already a consens on
>> adding a person
>> > before calling a vote.
>> >
>> > Makes sense?
>> >
>> > Cheers
>> > Christian
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Upayavira
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, 01 May 2011 19:56 +0200, "Simone Tripodi"
>> >> <simonetrip...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >>> Hi Upayavira!!!
>> >>> I agree that commons folks can have rw rights,
>> so people are already
>> >>> used to co-work in the 'commons way'.
>> >>> Moreover, I agreed on joining
>> >>>
>> >>> - dev@commons.a.o
>> >>> - users@commons.a.o
>> >>> - issues@commons.a.o
>> >>> - create the private ML where commons PMCs can
>> join.
>> >>>
>> >>> Does it make sense?
>> >>> Simo
>> >>>
>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> >>> http://www.99soft.org/
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Upayavira
>> <u...@odoko.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>> >>> > use commons-user: +1
>> >>> > put SVN in 'incubator' space: +1
>> >>> > grant "commons rw: +1 (assuming current
>> OGNL committers agree)
>> >>> >
>> >>> > As to a private list, I think the benefit
>> would be the opportunity for
>> >>> > the OGNL committers to learn how such
>> management happens. Where, for
>> >>> > example, would committer votes happen?
>> The issue with graduation to
>> >>> > Commons is what happens after graduation
>> - do they suddenly loose some
>> >>> > power over their own affairs, e.g. ease
>> of seeing vote threads. So not
>> >>> > sure the best on this one.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Upayavira
>> >>> >
>> >>> > On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 08:29 -0700, "Henri
>> Yandell" <flame...@gmail.com>
>> >>> > wrote:
>> >>> >> Agreed, no need to use the svn
>> location from Commons; though I ask to
>> >>> >> allow @commons rw access.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> The committer of the podling would
>> not automatically become PMC
>> >>> >> members, so I don't think there is a
>> need to setup a private list (or
>> >>> >> even to consider it a PPMC).
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Hen
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:05 PM,
>> Christian Grobmeier
>> >>> >> <grobme...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>> >> >> we could share MLs and also
>> SVN (Sandbox
>> >>> >> >> would be nice, not?)
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > MLs are fine, b/c one would need
>> to change address later, and
>> >>> >> > searching for pre-graduation
>> threads is more easily.
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > For SVN I don't see a benefit.
>> The repos can be moved with less effort
>> >>> >> > once component is graduated. I
>> would like to avoid to get something
>> >>> >> > into the sandbox which is not
>> cleared from legal perspective. What, if
>> >>> >> > OGNL fails in the incubator and
>> we just forget to remove the code from
>> >>> >> > the sandbox? If its in the
>> incubator part, it is like a tag
>> >>> >> > saying:"beware"
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > I would be +1 on user/dev ML but
>> leave SVN in incubator
>> >>> >> > Is there a need to create a pmc
>> ML for OGNL to discuss incubation
>> >>> >> > related matters?
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > Cheers
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >> What Incubator PMCs think
>> about it?
>> >>> >> >> Simo
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> >>> >> >> http://www.99soft.org/
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 7:34
>> AM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>> >> >>> Below is a thread from
>> the Commons Dev list in which I'm recommending
>> >>> >> >>> that OGNL use the
>> commons dev mailing list and that the svn
>> >>> >> >>> permissions allow the
>> ognl committers and the commons committers to
>> >>> >> >>> have read write access.
>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>>    http://commons.markmail.org/thread/ku3ouuilpiicb5is
>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>> Is this a concern for
>> anyone?
>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>> OGNL's target is to
>> graduate into Commons rather than to TLP, so
>> >>> >> >>> making it act like a TLP
>> seems destined to cause problems.
>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>> Hen
>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> >>> >> >>> For additional commands,
>> e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> >>> >> >> For additional commands,
>> e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > --
>> >>> >> > http://www.grobmeier.de
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> >>> >> > For additional commands, e-mail:
>> general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> >>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > http://www.grobmeier.de
>> >
>> >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Olivier Lamy
>> http://twitter.com/olamy
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/olamy
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to