For this type of vote, my -1 just means I'm against. It's not a veto. On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 6:04 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote: > James can I interpret your statement that this would rather be a -0 or -0.1? > Stating that there is no veto but that you personally don't like it ;) > > LieGrue, > strub > > --- On Thu, 9/9/10, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote: > >> From: James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> >> Subject: Re: Role of Incubator PMC Votes >> To: general@incubator.apache.org >> Date: Thursday, September 9, 2010, 7:17 PM >> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Greg >> Stein <gst...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > As I said, I haven't followed it. I meant if the -1 >> was a veto. If the >> > IPMC was vetoing a podling's choices on stuff like >> this. If you're >> > only using a vote as a preference/opinion marker, then >> sure... >> > definitely no problems with that! >> > >> >> The vote was stated to be a majority-rules vote, so my -1 >> was merely >> an indication of my opinion about the name. I >> normally wouldn't get >> into the podling's business (I don't troll their lists), >> but they did >> ask for the votes on the general list. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >> > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
