name=trademark
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Tim Williams <william...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm watching the "renaming" vote thread and I find it odd that folks > are -1-ing the project's vote. I've read the role of the IPMC[1] and > the policy[2] and can't find the basis for our (IPMC) doing anything > other than ack-ing they're vote. It seems like votes from the IPMC > should only be relevant/binding when the matter in question is > release/legal/trademark/etc-type issues that could [legally] effect > the foundation. I dunno, this seems purely a project matter to me > (like a logo, code, etc.) - second-guessing a project team on these > sort of subjective things seems counter-productive to grooming > self-sustaining projects to me. So, is this normal - why does the > IPMC really get anything more than an "advising" role in these sorts > of matters (and why is that healthy)? > > Thanks, > --tim > > [1] - > http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#Incubator+Project+Management+Committee+%28PMC%29 > [2] - > http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Incubation+Policy > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
