On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 09:58, ant elder <ant.el...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) > <chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > >> However, I'm not sure I get the whole reasoning below RE: TLP? Why not have >> a RAT TLP? The overhead of filing board reports and not knowing anyone on >> the team that would be able to? Hen files them all the time (well he used to >> as Attic VP). And the other names I see on that list [1] below are all >> people I widely respect at the ASF and folks who pop up on board@, members@ >> and other foundation-wide lists from time to time. I don't want to speak for >> anybody, but what would be the issue with any of them filing board reports? >> Or, yourself for that matter? :) You see to get this whole release process >> thing - how is the board report sent monthly for the first few months, then >> quarterly after such a big deal? So, what's the problem with being a TLP? > > Yep i agree, there are already other small TLPs so it doesn't need to > be an issue, so going TLP does sound ideal.
Yeah. There is no "minimum size" for a TLP. You've been filing reports to the Incubutor... now you file them to the Board. And "oh no! only once a quarter!". Heh. If you think an hour every three months is a hassle, then we need to talk. :-P --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
