On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) <chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> However, I'm not sure I get the whole reasoning below RE: TLP? Why not have a > RAT TLP? The overhead of filing board reports and not knowing anyone on the > team that would be able to? Hen files them all the time (well he used to as > Attic VP). And the other names I see on that list [1] below are all people I > widely respect at the ASF and folks who pop up on board@, members@ and other > foundation-wide lists from time to time. I don't want to speak for anybody, > but what would be the issue with any of them filing board reports? Or, > yourself for that matter? :) You see to get this whole release process thing > - how is the board report sent monthly for the first few months, then > quarterly after such a big deal? So, what's the problem with being a TLP? Yep i agree, there are already other small TLPs so it doesn't need to be an issue, so going TLP does sound ideal. ...ant --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
