On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 10:34 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > Yes, it seems that Hadoop PMC should supervise the vote for the chair, with > a slightly frustrating cc list of all of the actual committers to chukwa. > That way, nominations and votes for chair are archived on a private list. > > But the Incubator doesn't just say yes/no. We can refer this back to Hadoop > proposing this as a TLP, and even offer the list of mentors as observers, or > members of the initial PMC.
What do the originators of the proposal think of this direction? It sounds like they want to be a TLP, but are not sure they are yet ready. That leaves a burning question in my mind: Why do they feel they need the Incubator, rather than the Hadoop PMC, to help them mature into a TLP? I supported the Incubator proposal as it was written because I'm not sure Chukwa is getting the mentoring they need in their current home. I figure the Incubator is a good place to do that. I also support using the TLP naming because I think the Incubator can give them the mentoring they need and set them on their way in good time, and I'd like to avoid an extra renaming step. I would support what Bill has suggested if it was put to a vote, and honestly, I can't really say if one direction is preferable over the other. So, for now, I still support the proposal that has been put to a vote. Greg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
