On 6/23/2010 8:12 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: > On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 14:45, ant elder <ant.el...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> IMHO we should insist on using the incubator naming for the Chukwa >> website/svn/MLs because I think Chukwa should just go directly to a >> TLP and if they have to use the incubator naming it may help them >> decide that the direct to TLP route really is better ;-) > > I see you blinking here, so I guess this is not just for putting up a > strawman ;-)
Well folks, it's a fun debate and all, but it isn't helping bring this vote to a conclusion :) Is anyone in agreement with ant? Otherwise we should just move ahead and can hold a separate vote on allowing tlp resource creation at this time. If the proposers want (Eric?) a three choice vote, 1. recommend TLP with guides to help the initial pmc, 2. accept incubating with tlp resource naming, but -incubating release naming, or 3. accept incubating requiring all incubator naming conventions, that might help the incubator simplify this decision. At this point, I personally guess that 1. might be the most sensible in terms of resource creation and management; it would simply require the group to vote for an initial chair/VP. If they are unsure of their group yet, perhaps one of the other mentors would offer to serve as their chair for the first six months, if they rather would do that? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
