On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 4:23 AM, Hyrum K. Wright <hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu> wrote: > > On Dec 3, 2009, at 2:14 PM, Paul Querna wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Doug Cutting <cutt...@apache.org> wrote: >>> Paul Querna wrote: >>>> >>>> httpd and apr have published doxygen of their trunks periodically, >>>> they aren't based on any release. >>> >>> Were these published these on the official public website or in the dev/ >>> section? >>> >>> I was under the impression that released documentation should be treated >>> similarly to released code. The convention I've used is that stuff that's >>> in trunk, stuff that's intended to be included in releases, is only >>> published after release. Other pages on the website that are not included >>> in releases, e.g., the project's home page, are clearly published without a >>> release vote. >> >> <http://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/> >> >> Which is linked from the sidebar everywhere, and on the docs page: >> <http://httpd.apache.org/docs/> > > Back the original question: What's the best/typical way of generating and > providing these documents? Subversion is using svnwcsub to publish > subvesion.apache.org, but I don't think it's reasonable to check in a copy of > the API documentation.
To add to it and if i was not clear in my original email, when I say "update docs on nightly basis", I mean updating the files every night. It does not mean generating new set of doc files every night. Overall we'll maintain just one copy that is updated every night. I wish there should be a place other that site/ area in repository, if people.apache.org is not apt. -- Regards, Bhuvaneswaran A www.livecipher.com GPG: 0x7A13E5B0 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
