On 03/12/2009, Paul Querna <p...@querna.org> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Doug Cutting <cutt...@apache.org> wrote: > > Bhuvaneswaran A wrote: > >> > >> We tend to update the api docs generated using doxygen and java doc on > >> a nightly basis. > > > > Unreleased artifacts should be linked only from the developer portion of > the > > site and should not be hosted on the official project site. You might, > > e.g., just link to them on the Hudson server rather than copy them to > > people.apache.org. Documentation should only be published to the official > > website after it's been included in an Apache release. This is for legal > > reasons: we work hard to ensure that releases have licensing in order, but > > do not in general guarantee that licensing is correct at all times in > source > > code repositories. > > > I'm sorry what? > > httpd and apr have published doxygen of their trunks periodically, > they aren't based on any release.
And large parts of the ASF website (which can be considered as documentation) are not subject to formal "release" votes. Doug's comments seem OK if they refer to code releases, but surely documentation is not subject to release votes? > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
