On Wednesday 06 August 2008 04:05:04 Craig L Russell wrote: > I don't think the names PicaGalley and Picasa are similar at all. > > Pica is pronounced with a long "i" and stress on the "i". Picasa has a > short "i" and stress on the first "a". So to me they don't even share > "pica", which is a very common term in the printing/publishing industry. > > The name is nowhere close to a problem for me.
I agree to this analysis. Phonetically not confusing, and disallowing all names that has a "pic", "ture", "pho", "to", "im", "age" in a photo/picture/image system (since they are used one place or the other) is too strict. If the proposal for instance was "Pickata", "Pikala", or otherwise phonetically very similar, I would think the concern is substantiated. Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
