I don't think the names PicaGalley and Picasa are similar at all.
Pica is pronounced with a long "i" and stress on the "i". Picasa has a short "i" and stress on the first "a". So to me they don't even share "pica", which is a very common term in the printing/publishing industry.
The name is nowhere close to a problem for me. Craig On Aug 5, 2008, at 8:09 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Roland Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:I'm not sure how "similar" these names are, except for their starting with "pic-a", which is certainly not uncommon for software that is meant to handle pictures. But if others share your concern, I'm open for discussing other names.I also think the names are too similar, especially since the products have overlapping scopes. BR, Jukka Zitting --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Craig L Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
