On Jul 29, 2008, at 6:23 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Where I think that there is a problem is when they ditch their old
infrastructure and exclusively use ASF's infrastructure to build,
maintain, and release non-ASF releases. To be sure in the case of
JSecurity the final artifacts will not use the ASF mirrors but that
does not hide the fact that they intend to build and maintain non-
ASF
releases exclusively using our infrastructure.
It should be fine to use our infrastructure to hold the source code,
as long
as we don't have license pollution issues. They cannot use it to do
releases.
This seems at odds with what other incubating projects have done in
the past.
Where do you see a problem with having a single source location?
I don't see a problem housing the history of the project at ASF. I
was concerned about non-ASF releases coming from our infrastructure.
I now know that this is common practice for incubating projects.
Regards,
Alan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
