Actually I'm wrong The correct wording (I think) is:
..establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of open-source software for distribution at no charge to the public, that simplifies the development, deployment and management of distributed applications built as compositions of service components. These components may be implemented with a range of technologies and connected using a variety of communication protocols. This software will implement relevant open standards including, but not limited to, the SCA and SDO standards defined by the OASIS OpenCSA member section." Same question applies. Paul On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 9:24 PM, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Cesar > > The Tuscany project is aiming to have the following charter: > charged with > the creation and maintenance of open-source software that > simplifies the development and deployment of service oriented > applications and provides a managed service-oriented runtime > based on the standards defined by the OASIS OpenCSA group, > for distribution at no charge to the public. > > Are you saying that SDO falls out of that scope? > > Paul > > > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 8:31 PM, Cezar Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In my opinion SCA and SDO are two completely different technologies, > > even if they can be used together, they address different problems and > > as specifications they are developed separately. > > > > I think there are a lot of people looking only at SDO for their > > projects, and I'm sure there are others looking at SCA without SDO. I > > think having each community focus on their goals would help getting > > better organized, develop and independently graduate. > > > > Other than the technology/community point of view, the SDO code is not > > dependent on SCA code and as Ant Elder pointed out on Tuscany-user list > > (http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg02505.html ) > > the new infrastructure would seem a better fit. > > > > Cezar > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Paul Fremantle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 11:50 AM > > > To: general@incubator.apache.org > > > Subject: Re: [Proposal] NoNameYet : Link Error - please use this link > > > > > > > > Cezar > > > > > > I don't think anyone has suggested this code is a fork from Tuscany, > > > but thank you for making this completely clear. > > > > > > Is there any reason you aren't willing to do this work under the > > > existing scope of the Tuscany Incubator project? > > > > > > Paul > > > > > > > > > > > > > Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain > information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated > entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or > legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or > entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have > received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and > then delete it. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > -- > Paul Fremantle > Co-Founder and VP of Technical Sales, WSO2 > OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair > > blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com > -- Paul Fremantle Co-Founder and VP of Technical Sales, WSO2 OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
