In my opinion SCA and SDO are two completely different technologies, even if they can be used together, they address different problems and as specifications they are developed separately.
I think there are a lot of people looking only at SDO for their projects, and I'm sure there are others looking at SCA without SDO. I think having each community focus on their goals would help getting better organized, develop and independently graduate. Other than the technology/community point of view, the SDO code is not dependent on SCA code and as Ant Elder pointed out on Tuscany-user list (http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg02505.html ) the new infrastructure would seem a better fit. Cezar > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Fremantle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 11:50 AM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [Proposal] NoNameYet : Link Error - please use this link > > Cezar > > I don't think anyone has suggested this code is a fork from Tuscany, > but thank you for making this completely clear. > > Is there any reason you aren't willing to do this work under the > existing scope of the Tuscany Incubator project? > > Paul > Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
