Would this be ok? Change
Mentors are chosen by the Sponsor to actively monitor the podling, guide the podling in the Apache Way, and report its status to the Sponsor and the Incubator PMC. All Mentors must be members of the Incubator PMC. A Mentor has responsibilities toward the Incubator PMC, the Sponsor, and the community of the assigned Podling.
toA Podling has one or more Mentors, one of which MUST be an Apache Member. Mentors are chosen by the Sponsor to actively monitor the podling, guide the podling in the Apache Way, and report its status to the Sponsor and the Incubator PMC. All Mentors must be members of the Incubator PMC. A Mentor has responsibilities toward the Incubator PMC, the Sponsor, and the community of the assigned Podling.
If this works for you, I can post an updated patch and re-vote. Craig On May 21, 2007, at 1:21 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 5/21/07, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:There is, afaik, still some people who think that having more than one Mentor is unwise (the old saw is more than one mentor means no mentors)... If a podling wishes to have just 1, we should honor that, I think. Therefore I would think some sort of statement such as "The term 'Mentor' is not designed to be either singular or plural, and can either mean a single Mentor or a group of Mentors" or some such thing... I'm not ready to vote on it yet...Ditto to Jim's comments - multiple mentors are nice, but should not be a requirement. -- justin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
