Jukka, I asked exactly the same question: http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg09832.html
And the answer: http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg09864.html -- dims On 3/15/07, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, On 3/15/07, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 5) Having them separate from central really only annoys those who > actually want to use the official apache versions. For my customers, I > could easily create a com.dankulp:orb:1.0 pom that just depends on yoko > from the incubator repository. That can be put in central and my > customers can depend on that and not even know they are getting the > stuff from incubator. They would still be using the actual apache > incubator jars, but they wouldn't have to know about it. On 3/15/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > #5) I really hope you don't do this :) If I'm writing (outside the ASF) an application or a library that depends on a release artifact from an incubating Apache project, then I would be doing exactly that. If I'm happy with the artifact as a dependency, then why should I need to make my downstream users explicitly care about Apache's internal policies regarding incubating projects? Do we have some stated policy that if an external project depends on incubating releases, then they need to make their downstream users explicitly aware of that? IMHO the only requirements we place on external uses should be those of the ASLv2. BR, Jukka Zitting --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Davanum Srinivas :: http://wso2.org/ :: Oxygen for Web Services Developers --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
