On Monday 05 March 2007 22:21, George Aroush wrote: > Hi Dan and all, > > Many thanks to everyone who took the time to review this release and > comment on it. Much appreciated. > > I have completed #2, and #4 -- those are now committed into SVN. > > I am working on #1 trying to figure it out. This is my first time, so > there is a lot form me to look over and figure things out. > > As for #3, I can use some more comment. The current header reflect > what's found in the Java Lucene source code such that any place Java > Lucene uses the newer header > (http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#headers) so is Apache > Lucene.Net. Won't this do?
If you scroll down to the faq section on that page, it specifically says that ALL releases after Nov 1, 2006 MUST comply with the policy. It also explains why as well as provides links to scripts to update the files. IMO, it has to be done. Dan > Regards, > > -- George Aroush > > -----Original Message----- > From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 10:02 AM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of Apache Lucene.Net 2.0 build > 003 incubating > > > George, > > On Sunday 04 March 2007 22:38, George Aroush wrote: > > Hi Dan, > > Many thanks for looking this over. > > > > For #1 & #2. Can you tell how to go about fixing them? How/where do > > I create/get those files? > > For #1, there is a lot of information at: > http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html > Reading through that all can be a bit daunting, but there's a LOT of > very good information about GPG and encryption and keys and stuff there. > > > For #2, you just need a DISCLAIMER file in root that says something > like: ----------- > Apache Lucene.NET is an effort undergoing incubation at the Apache > Software Foundation (ASF), sponsored by the Apache Incubator PMC. > > Incubation is required of all newly accepted projects until a further > review indicates that the infrastructure, communications, and decision > making process have stabilized in a manner consistent with other > successful ASF projects. > > While incubation status is not necessarily a reflection of the > completeness or stability of the code, it does indicate that the project > has yet to be fully endorsed by the ASF. > ------------ > > > For #3, those are the same header as used by the Java Lucene 2.0 > > release. The port from Java to C# caries over the same headers, etc. > > See: > ttp://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html > > > I hope that helps. > Dan > > > For #4, I agree. > > > > All: This is my first release, so if you find issues, please try to be > > specific. > > > > Regards, > > > > -- George Aroush > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 10:02 PM > > To: general@incubator.apache.org > > Cc: George Aroush > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of Apache Lucene.Net 2.0 build > > 003 incubating > > > > > > -1 (non-binding) > > > > > > After a very quick perusal: > > 1) Missing gpg signatures on the files. > > > > 2) No incubator disclaimer anywhere. > > > > 3) All the files have the "old style" Apache header. They should > > have been updated to the new style. The copyright dates in the old > > headers are obviously not updated (most say 2004) which is one good > > reason to change to the new version that doesn't have it. > > > > 4) The readme's and such just say "Lucene". They should be clear that > > it's "Apache Lucene". > > > > > > Dan > > > > On Sunday 04 March 2007 19:29, George Aroush wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > Lucene.Net community has voted to release Lucene.Net 2.0 build 003 > > > incubating. I am emailing you to request your vote for this > > > release. > > > > > > (For those who are not familiar with Lucene.Net, please visit > > > http://incubator.apache.org/lucene.net/ to learn more.) > > > > > > Below are the release details. > > > > > > Release history: > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/trunk/C%23/src > > >/H IS TORY .txt > > > > > > Release artifact (source & binary): > > > http://people.apache.org/~aroush/Lucene.Net-2.0-003/ > > > > > > Release vote history on Lucene.Net mailing list: > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-lucene-net-dev/20 > > >07 02 .mbo x/[EMAIL PROTECTED] and > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-lucene-net-user/2 > > >00 70 2.mb ox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > I'm asking for your vote to approve this release. > > > > > > [ ] +1 Approve the release as Apache Lucene.Net 2.0.0 build 003 > > > incubating [ ] -1 Veto this release (explain why so it can be > > > addressed) > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > -- George Aroush > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- J. Daniel Kulp Principal Engineer IONA P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dankulp.com/blog --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
