Hi Yonik, You are right -- which is why I have this problem. Since this release is a port of Java Lucene 2.0, it is still based on version 2.0's old header.
IMNAL, but how critical is this? Isn't the LICENSE.txt file enough? I can write a script to change the current old header to the new header, but I rather spend this time working on 2.1 port (and figuring out how to create a PGP for this release.) Regards, -- George Aroush -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yonik Seeley Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 10:37 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of Apache Lucene.Net 2.0 build 003 incubating On 3/5/07, George Aroush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As for #3, I can use some more comment. The current header reflect > what's found in the Java Lucene source code such that any place Java > Lucene uses the newer header > (http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#headers) so is Apache Lucene.Net. Won't this do? The catch is that you're using an old version of Java Lucene, before the new headers were required. All of the license headers have since been changed in lucene-java. Perhaps use a script to change them all after you do the Java->C# conversion. -Yonik --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
