Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi,
I agree with Marc that we should continue to iterate on the
0.9.6-incubating release until we get it right. It would only be
confusing if we actually publish the incubating release and then publish
another 0.9.6. But iterations on the release candidate aren't new releases.
Yes, but it is confusing if you look at the thread about voting on
0.9.6. If 0.9.7 isn't available. Can we have 0.9.6.1 as the next
iteration of the 0.9.6 release?
Upayavira
On Nov 21, 2006, at 8:16 AM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
William
Good point, but since the trunk (from which
"0.9.7-incubating-SNAPSHOT" nighties are being built) has advanced
with potentially destabilizing changes since the branch point
"0.9.6-incubating", it might be even more confusing for anyone who is
relying on "0.9.7-incubating-SNAPSHOT" changes to see them suddenly
gone in a subsequent "0.9.7-incubating" release. We'd rather fix the
issues with the licenses and other miscellaneous issues and get the
release out the door without introducing the risk of new and changed
code causing unnecessary problems and further delays.
On Nov 21, 2006, at 5:44 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
For the purposes of closure, I am officially withdrawing this vote for
the openjpa 0.9.6-incubating release while we make the changes that
Robert mentions.
We expect that a new vote will be started for the 0.9.6-incubating
release
Remember version numbers are *cheap* - burn one. It resolves confusion
over 'which 0.9.6 is the problem?' 0.9.7, .8, .9, .10 etc can always
follow (and is a good sign the releases are being triple checked when
versions end up begin skipped.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
