William
Good point, but since the trunk (from which "0.9.7-incubating-
SNAPSHOT" nighties are being built) has advanced with potentially
destabilizing changes since the branch point "0.9.6-incubating", it
might be even more confusing for anyone who is relying on "0.9.7-
incubating-SNAPSHOT" changes to see them suddenly gone in a
subsequent "0.9.7-incubating" release. We'd rather fix the issues
with the licenses and other miscellaneous issues and get the release
out the door without introducing the risk of new and changed code
causing unnecessary problems and further delays.
On Nov 21, 2006, at 5:44 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
For the purposes of closure, I am officially withdrawing this vote
for
the openjpa 0.9.6-incubating release while we make the changes that
Robert mentions.
We expect that a new vote will be started for the 0.9.6-incubating
release
Remember version numbers are *cheap* - burn one. It resolves
confusion
over 'which 0.9.6 is the problem?' 0.9.7, .8, .9, .10 etc can always
follow (and is a good sign the releases are being triple checked when
versions end up begin skipped.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
