Hello Upayavira,

thanks a lot for your email.

The status page exists at this location :
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/ivy.html

Xavier already answered that he is working on the software grant.

Can all the interested parties (champions, mentors, and of course Xavier and 
Maarten) check that the data on the status page reflects what we want to have 
for ivy.

One detail, which I copied from the Wiki page : no separate distribution list 
for the commit messages. This will mean that the commit messages when changes 
are done in svn will go to the ivy-dev list (like ant-dev). Xavier, Maarten, do 
you want to have it that way ? Some projects have a [project name]-commits 
separate list.

Also, can I request the creation of the svn directory for ivy before the grant 
is received, or shall I wait for this one ?

If involved parties are OK with the name of the mailing lists (ivy-ppmc, 
ivy-dev, ivy-user), can I go ahead to ask the mailing lists to be setup ?

Some projects call their ppmc list private (for instance would be ivy-private). 
Do we have to obey to this convention ?

Regards,

Antoine
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Datum: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:37:47 +0000
Von: Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: general@incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [PROPOSAL] Ivy

> Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I am not familiar with the legal aspects of bringing an external
> codebase to the incubator.
> > 
> > William Rowe wrote that jayasoft needs to fill in a software grant to
> the ASF.
> > 
> > 
> > If this is right, the software grant must be received and accepted
> before setting up the infrastructure (svn, mailing lists, ...).
> 
> Software grant must be received before code can be imported into SVN. 
> Other infra can be set up now (assuming a status page exists, which I 
> think you've done).
> 
> Regards, Upayavira
> 
> > -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> > Datum: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 05:48:26 -0500
> > Von: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > An: general@incubator.apache.org
> > Betreff: Re: [PROPOSAL] Ivy
> > 
> >> Xavier Hanin wrote:
> >>> I've just sent both an individual and a corporate CLA by fax. I was
> not
> >>> sure the corporate CLA was necessary, but since Jayasoft is the
> current
> >>> copyright holder of Ivy, I thought it might be required.
> >> Probably a good idea; the point to a Corporate CLA is actually an
> >> agreement
> >> between your employer and yourself that what you do with the Foundation
> is
> >> with their blessing.  The ICLA you signed claims you have that right
> >> already,
> >> but we all know how painful employment contracts and their covenants
> are
> >> :)
> >>
> >> Best to be safe for your benefit.
> >>
> >> There is a DIFFERENT form, a Software Grant, which would be needed for
> a
> >> wholesale import of a code base owned by another party.  See
> >>
> >> http://www.apache.org/licenses/#grants (very bottom paragraph.)
> >>
> >> Bill
> >>
> > 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to