On 10/30/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On 31/10/06, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Personnally I don't mind, What I like with only one list is that you can
> easily reply to a commit and discuss it if required. Having two separate
> lists is more "scalable". If any other one has a preference, it's ok for
me.

We set the reply-to so that discussions on commits should come back to
the dev@ list, so you get the advantage of uncluttering the archives
and the list being less intimidating to new developers, while avoiding
fracturing the discussion.


This seems to be a good solution. I would go with it if others are ok.

Xavier

Reply via email to