On 10/30/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 31/10/06, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Personnally I don't mind, What I like with only one list is that you can > easily reply to a commit and discuss it if required. Having two separate > lists is more "scalable". If any other one has a preference, it's ok for me. We set the reply-to so that discussions on commits should come back to the dev@ list, so you get the advantage of uncluttering the archives and the list being less intimidating to new developers, while avoiding fracturing the discussion.
This seems to be a good solution. I would go with it if others are ok. Xavier