Hi, It seems like there's clear consensus now around this question of the initial committers list. Thanks to everyone for joining the debate.
A couple of things stand out to me from this: it is important to follow the process and treat approval of a proposal in terms of the agreement it represents (and carry it out accordingly) and that as Roy said although it may take some time in the end the right thing will happen. Can we please ensure that everyone on the committers list for CXF is now given appropriate status? Thanks, Eric -----Original Message----- From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 8:14 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Policy on Initial Committership Roy T. Fielding wrote: > > Mentors have NO RIGHT and NO RESPONSIBILITY to make > decisions on behalf of a project as if they owned the project. The > Mentors are only there to help the project govern itself and, in > some cases, be counted as one of the people on the PPMC. > ++1. And I certainly did not act in that way, and, in fact tried to prevent any such thing from happening. -- ======================================================================== === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball." --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
