On Oct 1, 2006, at 4:16 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Justin,
On Sunday October 01 2006 3:22 pm, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
We've seen an example of this with Celtixfire. So far, we're
waiting for
an explanation (as those discussions did not occur in a place
where the
Incubator PMC could provide any oversight), but the aggrieved parties
believe they have been barred access to a project they felt they
contributed to.
That's not it. The issue is they have been barred access to a
project they
have only expressed interest in contributed to. They have not yet
contributed anything (no code, no patches, little to no
communication on the
dev list, etc...). That is why the CXF mentors decided it was
in-appropriate to give them commit access. There name was on the
initial
proposal, but after two months, there was still no contributions.
Those
individuals are basically stating that since there name was on the
proposal,
that is enough to get the commit rights.
Basically, Jason and the other mentors thought the initial
commiters should
actually be those who contribute/commit stuff. Those who don't
meet that
barrier haven't earned the commit rights, so why should they have
commit
rights?
We should also set some sense of scale here... IIRC, we
are talking about ~3 people, out of ~20.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
