Justin Erenkrantz wrote:

On 10/1/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


I disagree.  You're conflating process with application of process, and
then
stating as assured a case when your fellow PMC Members would act in a
manner
you find offensive.

Why would the PMC not elect "the people who contributed it further
access"?



We've seen an example of this with Celtixfire. So far, we're waiting for an
explanation (as those discussions did not occur in a place where the
Incubator PMC could provide any oversight), but the aggrieved parties
believe they have been barred access to a project they felt they contributed
to.

So, I don't believe this situation isn't a hypothetical at all. -- justin

It seems to me that this is the reverse actually - committers were approved, and then the PMC revoked their rights. However, this is just inference on my part so far.

- Dan

--
Dan Diephouse
(616) 971-2053
Envoi Solutions LLC
http://netzooid.com


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to