Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I am pretty philosophically against making every committer PPMC
> > > > > members.
> > > I don't agree at all. If they contribute code, they merit a say in
the
> > > direction of the project.
> > Are you reading Dan's statement as independent or dependent upon time?
I
> > read it as an objection to mandated concurrency. Over time, your view
> > should be the dominant one, as each Committer becomes a (P)PMC member.
> as for the one line that you retained: I view Dan's perspective as
> being independent of time - that is, committers should never equal
> the PMC - I view that as extremely unhealthy.
If I had read it as you do, I would agree with you. I read it as suggestive
of a process over time, and that at any snapshot in time, the body of
Committers might not be entirely present in the PPMC.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
