On 10/1/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
would however encourage only voting people in after they an appropriate level of committment and involvement with the project.
This creates a dividing line by omitting past contributions from the discussion which I feel is inappropriate. For example, if I were to work on a project for many months at Google Code and then propose it to come here, why shouldn't I continue to have a say in what the project does? Why do I need to justify myself all over again? Why aren't my past contributions enough to merit a seat on the PPMC? What gives the mentors the power to 'reset' the community and block me from participating until I jump through their vague and ill-defined hoops? -- justin
