On 6/30/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/29/06, Martin Sebor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > sophitia que wrote: > [...] > > I don't think it's unreasonable that we expect proposing parties to at > > least browse and read parts of the incubator web site prior to a > > submission. Our obligation, as the incubator, would be to 1) ensure > that > > any official guidelines we develop are prominently and visibly > displayed on > > the incubator web site, 2) promote community and cultural processes > that > > reinforce these practices. > > I agree. Listing these guidelines or recommendations in a document > (or a section of one) specifically designated for third parties > wishing to propose a project will be a big help. IMO, the section > named Entry To Incubation of the Incubation would be a good place. > The Branding Guidelines is where I would tend to look for guidance > after my proposal has been accepted but not necessarily until then. interesting... i'd hope that proposers would read all of the incubator documentation and a reasonable percentage of the foundation documentation. perhaps i was being optimisitic :-/ a separate entry to incubator document sounds like a good idea.
(Doh! sent too early) but with links into branding and the other documents rather than move the content. - robert
