On 6/29/06, Martin Sebor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
sophitia que wrote: [...] > I don't think it's unreasonable that we expect proposing parties to at > least browse and read parts of the incubator web site prior to a > submission. Our obligation, as the incubator, would be to 1) ensure that > any official guidelines we develop are prominently and visibly displayed on > the incubator web site, 2) promote community and cultural processes that > reinforce these practices. I agree. Listing these guidelines or recommendations in a document (or a section of one) specifically designated for third parties wishing to propose a project will be a big help. IMO, the section named Entry To Incubation of the Incubation would be a good place. The Branding Guidelines is where I would tend to look for guidance after my proposal has been accepted but not necessarily until then.
interesting... i'd hope that proposers would read all of the incubator documentation and a reasonable percentage of the foundation documentation. perhaps i was being optimisitic :-/ a separate entry to incubator document sounds like a good idea. - robert
