Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> A number of infrastucture issues. Votes from the Incubator PMC and
Geronimo
> PMC. To do that responsibly, I'd say that we would want to see
communities
> having demonstrated that they understand how to practice as an ASF
> community. Such things are subjective, and typically have taken some
time.
>
> Looking at the historical record: Derby took a year; Nutch took 5 months;
> JaxME and jUDDI took 6 months; JDO took 7 months. Those are just a few
> projects that have graduated to another TLP, and every community is
> different, but ActiveMQ and ServiceMix haven't been in the Incubator for 3
> months, and are still moving over their infrastructure. Anyone see a need
> to rush to judgment?
> I don't see any rush here. Is it not a natural question to ask what
> else is left to do?
Sure. And I did answer. There are objective critera, and a subjective
judgment that the community is ready. The references to other projects,
with the caveats, were in terms of setting expectations based upon what has
been the case over a large set of projects. As a general rule, communities
of any size do spend more time than ActiveMQ has spent so far.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
