I'm resurrecting the thread that fell off into /dev/null after http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200603.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
So this sentence in http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Acceptance+of+Proposal+by+Sponsor doesn't match current reality and confuses TLP sponsors who think they need to wait for an Incubator PMC vote: > The Incubator PMC MAY immediately accept the Candidate, or may (at the > discretion of the Incubator PMC) require a successful VOTE by the Incubator > PMC. Here are a couple replacement suggestions that give the Incubator PMC an opportunity to voice any objections: a) Sponsor may proceed with podling creation if the Incubator PMC raises no issues within three days. - or - b) Sponsor may proceed with podling creation after the Incubator PMC acknowleges the request. Which would work best? Or feel free to toss both out and offer a better suggestion. This sentence is also a problem, but I'll re-raise it once the discussion about minimum # mentors shakes out: > The nominated Mentors MAY be immediately accepted by the Incubator PMC. > However the Incubator PMC MAY also suggest replacement Mentors. The Incubator > PMC has the final choice of Mentors. thanks, -jean --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
