On 3/15/06, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a concern about item 2. It has been my experience that the Incubator > PMC can be a bit tardy in replying to emails. May I suggest that the 72 hour > window starts w/ item 1? Given that, then item 2 seems superfluous.
Well, given that we haven't tried this policy, I don't think it's fair to say that the Incubator PMC will be tardy on issuing the ACK - that'd be a fine complaint to make if you witness it after the policy is in effect. The Incubator PMC is delegated with the authority to approve code imports. No other PMCs have the authority to approve code imports or podling creation. > My next concern is in regard to 3. It implies that if the Incubator PMC does > not positively vote for the incubation, then it does not get incubated. > IIUC, the Incubator PMC cannot block the start of the incubation of a project > that has been sponsored by another PMC. Maybe that changed, I may have > missed that exchange. By and large, I would not expect #3 (someone saying 'no') to happen very much. The only valid complaints are about the form and procedures being followed. All other complaints by Incubator PMC members about a podling (such as that they don't like technology 'foo') should be bit-bucketed. If people try to vote against a podling sponsored by another PMC because of personal non-procedural reasons, they're going to get hit with a cluebat. -- justin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
