Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On 3/14/06, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>I'm resurrecting the thread that fell off into /dev/null after >>http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200603.mbox/[EMAIL >>PROTECTED] >> >>So this sentence in >>http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Acceptance+of+Proposal+by+Sponsor >>doesn't match current reality and confuses TLP sponsors who think they >>need to wait for an Incubator PMC vote: >> >> >>>The Incubator PMC MAY immediately accept the Candidate, or may (at the >>>discretion of the Incubator PMC) require a successful VOTE by the Incubator >>>PMC. >> >>Here are a couple replacement suggestions that give the Incubator PMC an >>opportunity to voice any objections: >> >> a) Sponsor may proceed with podling creation if the Incubator PMC >>raises no issues within three days. >> >>- or - >> >> b) Sponsor may proceed with podling creation after the Incubator PMC >>acknowleges the request. > > > a+b. =) > > How about following the board's system for acknowledging new PMC members: > 1. PMC *chair* of Sponsor sends in notification to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 1. Any Incubator PMC member can then send an ACK and start a 72hr clock. > 2. If any PMC member says "hold" before 72hrs are up, a formal > discussion/vote is then conducted. > 3. If no PMC member has any negative comment at the end of 72hr clock, > then the PMC chair can commit the status file and 'start' the podling. > > How does that sound? -- justin
I like it -- it's sane and uses another established procedure. If there aren't any objections, I'll change the docs to reflect this on Saturday, giving everyone adequate time to comment. -jean --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
