"Paul Russell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I'm /so/ +1 for this (the TLP bit -- you /know/ I'm +1 the rest of it > too!) it's making me late for work! My day job involves working for a > large enterprise (the largest insurer in the UK). To large > organisations like that, visibility is everything, and they would want > to see that workflow is being taken very seriously by Apache before > buying in (I know this is a bit of a stupid attitude, but such is the > way with large companies). To give you an idea of how seriously /we/ > take workflow, we currently spend several million pounds a year > maintaining our own workflow system (developed before the rest of the > world 'did' workflow). As you can imagine, we're currently looking to > replace this. Right now, the likely candidates are commercial, but it'd > be nice to have an alternative. > > The other reason I'm for a TLP is that I can see a number of other > projects that might spring up around this (an Agila plug-in for > Eclipse, for example?), and it seems more cohesive to host these all > under one well-focused TLP. > > As ever, just my $0.10. > > Paul > -- > Paul Russell > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > iChat/AIM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1 for going forward as one project and for going for a TLP when we are ready! I already know someone who has a prototype of a BPEL editor (as an eclipse plug-in) which we could start with for tooling. Sanjiva. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
