Guys,
On 26 Oct 2004, at 09:02, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
On Oct 26, 2004, at 3:27 AM, Matthieu Riou wrote:Very practically, what is the conclusion of this discussion ? :)Not sure if one is required. I don't think solving the TLP problem is a good idea now because we're going to learn a lot more as time goes on. I'm optimistic that we'll go that way at the end, but lets decide that later. If we have enough size and strength to be a TLP, we do it. If not, we don't. Until then, lets try and build some really great software and a great community.
I do think that working to have BPEL implementation at the ASF is a great idea, and while I'm 100% committed to seeing it a part of Agila, it doesn't have to only be in Agila. For example, we could have a BPEL engine as part of the project that can be used standalone or inside Agila.
Indeed! I might have missed some mails on this (personal infrastructure problems -- was dropping lots of mails the beginning half of this week), so forgive me if I'm covering old ground, but I'd advocate a 'test and learn' approach here -- Why don't we incubate the two projects separately for a while. It'll become obvious if they should be merged or not, and I can't see any reason why merging two projects in the incubator would be a problem?
Does that seem reasonable, or am I being dumb?
Paul -- Paul Russell E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] iChat/AIM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
