Berin Lautenbach wrote: ... > However I believe there needs to be a formalisation that there
is one Incubator PMC member who is ensuring the PPMC is meeting their requirements of accountability.
The fact that only one is not enough and more are needed has already been seen in practice and decided, so it's not up for discussion anymore. What we know is that we need *at least* one Mentor, but more are better.
The role of the incubator is to actively oversite projects coming on board. Unless we have someone we can point to who is doing that active oversite and reporting any issues, then I believe we cannot (as easily) show oversite.
Doesn't work this way. At work, I show that I have oversight if I know what is going on and things go smoothly. To know what is going on we have status reports (that I'll ask for very soon), and for the latter we need more Mentors. Pointing fingers is not our goal, making things actually be done instead is.
What we do need *identifiable* Mentors that we can reasonably assure are following the project. For me, having them (auto)listed on this page [1] is enough.
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
