On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> Personally, I think it is an excellent proposal except for one item: > Java is not the center of the universe. Either this project should > consider all languages (seems unlikely, unless you already have those > other people in place), or the project should be named after the > product name and not the whole category of software. A name like > "jeldap" (I've only seen that word used in relation to turbine) > would get you past a number of hurdles. This seems a little reactionary. What does it matter what language an ldap is written in? That's like telling a java implemented database that it can't call itself 'apache-sql' or something. I could be making a bad assumption. I assume this is either to the name ldapd or directory. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
