On 8/11/03 4:08 PM, "robert burrell donkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sunday, August 10, 2003, at 06:23 PM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > >> On 8/10/03 5:30 AM, "robert burrell donkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> On Saturday, August 9, 2003, at 03:46 AM, Vic Cekvenich wrote: >>> 2. tapestry lacked active support from apache members. >>> >> >> That is NOT true. > > no offense intended andrew. i didn't know that you were a member (but i > should have checked up before posting). > No problem. I just wanted to clarify that this was not actually true. I went to Tapestry, helped them learn the voting rules, decision making process, etc. However there was no acceptance process to communicate because it was in flux. It is my opinion that the incubator is an ill-conceived entity because it gives ownership to those who do not have a natural interest in the particular community. Tapestry makes a poor example though because they were the first, got pushed around by jakarta then by the incubator, etc. Its like having a remote process for thread management. -Andy > - robert > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Andrew C. Oliver http://www.superlinksoftware.com/poi.jsp Custom enhancements and Commercial Implementation for Jakarta POI http://jakarta.apache.org/poi For Java and Excel, Got POI? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
