Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> wrote:
    > definition which was objected to by multiple IESG members.
    > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-integrations/ballot/
    > (in RFC-editor Q, on missref)

    > So, if you didn't like that definition before, then probably you should
    > object to RFC8499bis keeping it.

Ted's original review that lead to this:

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsdir/Ev83RjCbQcC64paenZXJawKxu9k/


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide




Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to