> I would say that if the WG didn't think it was important at the time by forgetting it, it probably is not an "important term", and I can see this not being fixed in an IETF LC anymore as an acceptable outcome.
Sure, if I'm in the rough that's fine. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
