On Sat, Sep 16, 2023 at 11:01 AM Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@icann.org> wrote:
> On Sep 15, 2023, at 6:01 PM, Salz, Rich <rs...@akamai.com> wrote: > [...] > > On the other hand, spending a week or two repeating a cycle to get an > important term in the current document seems like a better solution. > > If the WG agrees that this is an important term, sure. > Dear Paul and Rich, for what it is worth, the term is used in the industry and I believe documenting its use in a RFC will be worth the extra week or two to have consensus in the WG on a definition. Cheers, - vijay
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
