Ron Frederick <r...@timeheart.net> writes:
> Hi Mark,
>
> On Feb 15, 2021, at 1:06 PM, Mark D. Baushke <m...@juniper.net> wrote:
> > Ron Frederick <r...@timeheart.net> writes:
> >> On Feb 15, 2021, at 10:54 AM, Mark D. Baushke
> >> <mdb=40juniper....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> >>> Suggestion to the reviewer of replacement paragraphs before the table in
> >>> section 4 "Summary Guidance for Key Exchange Method Names Implementations"
> >>>
> >>> [snip]
> >>> It is suggested that the MUST NOT key exchange method code be
> >>> removed from the any implementations using them.
> >>
> >> This should be “from any” instead of “from the any”.
> >
> > Hmmm... I seem to have managed to lose what I intended to write. I will
> > suggest this as a replacement:
> >
> > It is suggested that the code which implements a "MUST NOT" key
> > exchange method have that implementation code be removed.
>
> There’s some redundancy with “code” here twice, and “have..be” still doesn’t
> read right. I’d suggest:
>
> It is suggested that the code which implements a "MUST NOT" key
> exchange method be removed from implementations that contain it.
+1 I like it. Thank you!
> > Thank you very much for your review of the text I wrote.
>
>
> No problem!
> --
> Ron Frederick
> r...@timeheart.net
Be safe, stay healthy,
-- Mark
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
