Hi Mark, A couple of minor issues with the recommended text (grammatical, not technical):
On Feb 15, 2021, at 10:54 AM, Mark D. Baushke <mdb=40juniper....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > Suggestion to the reviewer of replacement paragraphs before the table in > section 4 "Summary Guidance for Key Exchange Method Names Implementations" > > [snip] > It is suggested that the MUST NOT key exchange method code be > removed from the any implementations using them. This should be “from any” instead of “from the any”. > The Implement column is the current recommendations of this RFC. Key > Exchange Method Names are listed alphabetically. This is ordering is > not intended to be the order used in either the server or client > negotiation lists. This should be “This ordering is” instead of “This is ordering is”. -- Ron Frederick r...@timeheart.net _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
