Dear Paul,

Thank you very much for your comments!  They are all good catches, corrected in 
-14 (that we will post shortly).  

Kind regards
--- Alex

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Kyzivat [mailto:pkyzi...@alum.mit.edu] 
Sent: Friday, December 1, 2017 9:54 AM
To: draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology....@ietf.org
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of 
draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-13

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team 
(Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF 
Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For 
more information, please see the FAQ at 
<​http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-13
Reviewer: Paul Kyzivat
Review Date: 2017-12-01
IETF LC End Date: 2017-12-11
IESG Telechat date: TBD

Summary:

This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be 
fixed before publication.

Disclaimer:

I conducted this review without any knowledge of YANG modeling. So the sort of 
review I can do is superficial.

Issues:

Major: 0
Minor: 0
Nits:  2

(1) NIT: Section 1 - Language

s/example model is/an example model is/
s/full-blown OSPF model/a complete OSPF model/ s/augments general 
network/augments the general network/


(2) NIT: Section 4 - typo

Something is wrong with:

    The YANG modules ietf-network and ietf-network are designed to be
    used in conjunction with implementations that support the Network

Did you perhaps mean:

    The YANG modules ietf-network and ietf-network-topology are ...




_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to