Bad response on my part about the OGC URN. Does anyone know if http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/OGC/1.3/CRS84 is supposed to resolve to something other than an ogc:ExceptionReport (I'm seeing Failed resolving http://www.opengis.netcrs/OGC/1.3/CRS84)?
Should we go back to the urn:ogc:def:crs:OGC::CRS84 URN? Or maybe remove this sentence altogether? Tim On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 12:07 AM, Tim Schaub <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for the comments Meral. I've proposed > https://github.com/geojson/draft-geojson/pull/208 to incorporate them. > Responses below ... > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Meral Shirazipour > <[email protected]> wrote: > > ... > >> -[Page 3], "any thing"--typo-->"anything" > > I *think* the original text was meant to emphasize "thing", but it > ends up sounding awkward to me. I think we should go with "anything" > if others agree. > >> -[Page 4], KML not spelled out at first use (Keyhole Markup Language?) > > Done. > >> -[Page 11],PIDF-LO, please spell out at first use and maybe reference >> RFC5139. > > Done. But see below ... > >> -[Page 11], it says >> >> "Applications such as PIDF-LO that are sensitive to location >> >> uncertainty and confidence might treat ... >> >> " >> >> Not clear: if this is not an OK behavior, it should say "should not >> treat..."? If this is an ok behavior, maybe it should say "MAY treat ..." > > I agree that this paragraph might add confusion. I think the section > on Uncertainty and Confidence would be clearer if the whole paragraph > were removed. > >> -[Page 12], "in the the case"---typo-->"in the case" > > Good catch. There were three of these. > >> -[Page 12], "the OGC's "http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/OGC/1.3/CRS84"; >> [OGCURL]. " >> >> Should the URL be moved to reference section? > > Since http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/OGC/1.3/CRS84 is a URN, I don't > think it makes sense to include in the reference section. It would be > nice if it resolved to something useful so it could serve as a > reference though. > >> -[Page 13], "or to to have"--typo-->"or to have" > > Changed. > >> -[Page 16], "the the semantics"--typo-->"the semantics" > > Also changed. > >> -[Page 18], "can not be"---->"cannot be" > > Done. > > Tim > >> >> >> Best Regards, >> >> Meral >> >> --- >> >> Meral Shirazipour >> >> Ericsson Research >> >> www.ericsson.com _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
