Thanks for the comments Meral. I've proposed https://github.com/geojson/draft-geojson/pull/208 to incorporate them. Responses below ...
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Meral Shirazipour <[email protected]> wrote: ... > -[Page 3], "any thing"--typo-->"anything" I *think* the original text was meant to emphasize "thing", but it ends up sounding awkward to me. I think we should go with "anything" if others agree. > -[Page 4], KML not spelled out at first use (Keyhole Markup Language?) Done. > -[Page 11],PIDF-LO, please spell out at first use and maybe reference > RFC5139. Done. But see below ... > -[Page 11], it says > > "Applications such as PIDF-LO that are sensitive to location > > uncertainty and confidence might treat ... > > " > > Not clear: if this is not an OK behavior, it should say "should not > treat..."? If this is an ok behavior, maybe it should say "MAY treat ..." I agree that this paragraph might add confusion. I think the section on Uncertainty and Confidence would be clearer if the whole paragraph were removed. > -[Page 12], "in the the case"---typo-->"in the case" Good catch. There were three of these. > -[Page 12], "the OGC's "http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/OGC/1.3/CRS84"; > [OGCURL]. " > > Should the URL be moved to reference section? Since http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/OGC/1.3/CRS84 is a URN, I don't think it makes sense to include in the reference section. It would be nice if it resolved to something useful so it could serve as a reference though. > -[Page 13], "or to to have"--typo-->"or to have" Changed. > -[Page 16], "the the semantics"--typo-->"the semantics" Also changed. > -[Page 18], "can not be"---->"cannot be" Done. Tim > > > Best Regards, > > Meral > > --- > > Meral Shirazipour > > Ericsson Research > > www.ericsson.com _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
