Andrew C Aitchison via gdal-dev <gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org> writes: > Agreed. > > However, as I understand it, by using github we have allowed > copilot to include our code without it being covered by the usual > licence.
Perhaps "acquiesced", but the project does not have to right to grant hat license for code whose copyright is held by others. > I don't like that, but we don't seem to be talking about > looking for an alternative hosting site. That's another problem; everyone using github should have an open ticket to manage to leave. (I know it's hard.) > Actually, if gdal includes other code under one of the open source > licences, are *we* violating that licence by putting it on github and > allowing it to be used in copilot. yes. _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
