ElPaso via gdal-dev <gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org> writes: > I have read the discussion on lwn and I must say that I am more in > line with the debian position.
My view is that code that comes out of generative AI should be viewed as an improper derived work, and lacking adequate provenance/permission to be added to an open source project, period. As Even says, we could relax this in the future. It's very difficult to go back and remove things. > I find it ironic that as an open source developer who probably > contributed a lot of training material to feed the AI model I myself > am banned to use it. It's not ironic; it's taking the high moral ground and acting responsibly. You haven't "contributed" so much as AI companies have taken code under licenses and used that code to create derived works in violation of those licenses, ignoring the share alike and attribution requirements. In my view the only reasonable approach for the open source community is to shun bad behavior entirely. _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
