Hi,

> At the moment I am using copilot as a cut-and-paste on steroids and it 
> has improved my efficiency, to me it is no different than copying and 
> pasting from another file in the GDAL source code or going to SO to 
> search how to write a complex recursive lambda implementation in C++11, 
> cut the example and paste in GDAL. Note that in both cases the 
> copied/pasted or generated code will need careful review and adaptations.

I think it's worth mentioning that code taken from SO is licensed under 
CC-BY-SA, so it needs at least proper attribution. Looking at the GDAL 
codebase, I counted about 21 stackoverflow.com URLs, the vast majority of those 
added by Even, according to git blame. So either Even is almost the only GDAL 
contributor that uses Stack Overflow, or this might already be a problem.

Not to mention that a link in the source code might not be sufficient for 
attribution, especially if you're shipping binaries etc.

Laurentiu
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Reply via email to