Hi,

I’m seeing the following analyzer test failures on darwin. They were introduced 
in December, when the tests were moved around:
FAIL: c-c++-common/analyzer/fd-glibc-byte-stream-socket.c
FAIL: c-c++-common/analyzer/fd-manpage-getaddrinfo-client.c
FAIL: c-c++-common/analyzer/fd-mappage-getaddrinfo-server.c
FAIL: c-c++-common/analyzer/fd-symbolic-socket.c

They all have an unexpected analyzer warning, like this:

/Users/fx/gcc-upstream/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/analyzer/fd-glibc-byte-stream-socket.c:
 In function 'int main()':
/Users/fx/gcc-upstream/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/analyzer/fd-glibc-byte-stream-socket.c:43:17:
 warning: leak of file descriptor 'socket(2, 1, 0)' [CWE-775] 
[-Wanalyzer-fd-leak]
/Users/fx/gcc-upstream/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/analyzer/fd-glibc-byte-stream-socket.c:43:17:
 note: (1) socket created here
/Users/fx/gcc-upstream/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/analyzer/fd-glibc-byte-stream-socket.c:43:17:
 note: (2) when 'socket' succeeds
/Users/fx/gcc-upstream/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/analyzer/fd-glibc-byte-stream-socket.c:43:17:
 note: (3) 'socket(2, 1, 0)' leaks here
FAIL: c-c++-common/analyzer/fd-glibc-byte-stream-socket.c  -std=c++98 (test for 
excess errors)

I see they’ve been xfail'ed off on AIX and HPUX in previous patches, so I’m 
wondering: are the tests glibc-specific? If so, should we mark them as suck? Or 
are they real failures of the analyzer?

FX

Reply via email to